Benefactive declarative sentences in Indonesian: The role of the beneficiary in social behavior representation
Article Sidebar
-
benefactive verbs, beneficiaries, social behaviour, social impact
Abstract
Language shows a nation's character. Can Indonesian sentences with the predicate benefactive verbs show the character of the Indonesian nation? Benefactive sentences are sentences that have a subject argument as the beneficiaries and an object argument as the agent or vice versa. Subjects as agents and objects as beneficiaries. Beneficiaries can be oneself and can also be other people or personal things. In the Indonesian language by the beneficial declarative sentences, it can be determined the dominance of the beneficial. The problem is, what is the impact of the dominance of the beneficiary role on the behavior of Indonesian language users and what is the agent's relationship with our social beneficiaries and its social impact? The purpose of this study is to reveal the impact of dominance of the role of beneficiary in the benefactive verb on the declarative sentence of the Indonesian language, and the relationship of the agent with the beneficiary of circumstances or other people and their social impact. This research is qualitative research. The research data is in the form of declarative sentences in Indonesian which are predicated of benefactive verbs in people's speech, elementary-high school Indonesian language books, middle school economics books, and research data exploration. Research data was collected using observation and documentation methods using note-taking techniques and analyzed using distributional methods, interpretation, and analysis of meaning components. The results of this research can be concluded that beneficial declarative sentences in Indonesian show the behavior of the Indonesian people which is selfish, liberalist, and hedonistic, not socialist. The implications of these characteristics are for the nation's behavior, including corrupt public officials (only concerned with personal, family, and group profits)
Full text article
References
Amaral, P., Roberts, C., & Smith, E. A. (2007). Review of the logic of conventional implicatures by Chris Potts. Linguistics and Philosophy, 30, 707-749.
Asrumi, Soebroto, E., Sudaryanto. (2014). The Semantic Relation of Denominal, Deverbal, and Deadjectival Verbs with Other Arguments in the Osing Language. Macrothink Institute, International Journal of Linguistics, Vol. 6, No 2, 2014, pp51-69. http://www.macrothink.org.
Asrumi. (2016). Kebudayaan Using: Konstruksi, Identitas, dan Pengembangannya. Yogyakarta: Ombak.
Asruni,. (2022). Verba Transaksi: Analisis Leksikal dan Semantik Kata Merampok dan Mencuri (Sara Thorgren). Situbondo: Bashish Publishing.
Asrumi, Setiyari, A.D.; and Rasni, Hanny. 2022. The Effect of Mother’s Mindset about Children Ownership on Stunting Prevention in Jember, Indonesia. International Journal of Social Science And Human Research, Volume 05 Issue 09 September 2022.pp No: 4301-4314. file:///D:/ARTIKEL%20MITHA,%2023,%20SEPT/Artikel%20Stunting%20IJHSSR,%20September%202022.pdf
Basir, A. (2019). PERAN SEMANTIS DALAM KONSTRUKSI KALIMAT BERPREDIKAT KEPEMILIKAN DALAM BAHASA INGGRIS (Suatu Kajian Semantik). Jurnal Sora, 4(2), 52-63.
Carol, Dweck. (2008). Change Your Mindset Change Your Life. Nigelhotmes.com/graphic/two-mindsets-stanford-magazine.
Chaer, A. (2003). Psikolinguistik, Kajian Teoritik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Chafe, W.L. (1973). Meaning and Structure of Language. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press
Clark, Herbert H. dan & Eve V. Clark. (1977). Psychology and Language: An Introduction to Psycholinguistics. New York: Harcourt Brace and Jovanovich, Inc.
Hermann, Keren. (N.D). “Mengatasi Polisemi Kompleks: Perbandingan Konstruksi Datif-Benefaktif di Mandarin dan Thai”, Artikel. University of California: Berceley (journals.linguisticsociety.org/proceedings/index.php/BLS/article/viewFile/.../295/.
KBBI. (2021). Verba Benefaktif. https://kbbi.web.id/benefactive.
Leech, G. (1974). Semantic. Penguin Books.
Lukman Ali, dkk. (1996). Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.
Luardini, Maria Arina. (2011). “Struktur Semantis Verba sebagai Cerminan Pola Pikir
Komunitas Dayak Ngaju”. Artikel. Linguistika: Vol. 18, No. 35 September 2011 hal. 25 – 33. Bali: Program Studi Magister (S2) dan Doktor (S3) Linguistik Universitas Udayana.
Martono, Joko. (2011). “Pola Pikir Manusia”. Kompasiana.com.
Mueller, F. Max. (1887). The Science of Thought Three Introductory Lectures. Chicago: The Open Court Publishing Company.
Nababan, S. U. S. (1992). Psikolinguistik: Suatu Pengantar. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Pieget, Jean. (1924). The Language and Thought of the Child. New York: The World Publishing Company.
Piotr, S. (2007). Sosiologi Perubahan Sosial. Jakarta: prenada.
Potts, C. (2005). The logic of conventional implicatures. Oxford University Press, New York.
Sapir, Edward. (1970). Language: An Introduction to the Study of Speech. London: A Harvest Book.
Sée, H. (2004). Modern Capitalism: Its Origin and Educations. Edisi I, 1928,
Diterjemahkan Homer B. Vandrblue dan Georges F. Dariot. Batoche Books,
Kitchener, Ontario.
Sudaryanto. (2015). Metode dan Aneka Teknik Analisis Bahasa, Pengantar Penelitian Wahana Kebudayaan secara Linguistik. Yogyakarta: Duta Wacana University Press.
Sudaryat, Y. (2015). “The Mindset of Sundanese People in Their Language Expressions”, Artikel, in Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, July, Vol. 5, No. 1. UPI Bandung.
Sukesti. (1991). Risalah Penelitian Kata Kerja Benefaktif dalam Bahasa Jawa. Yogyakarta: Depdikbud.
Vygotsky, L.S. (1962). Thought and Language. Cambridge, M.A.: The M.I.T. Press.
Yunus, M. (2014). Mindset Revolution. Yogyakarta: Galangpress Publisher.
Yusuke, K. dan Wataru, U. (2005). “Continuation-based Semantics for Conventional Implikatures: The Case of Japanese Benefactives”, Article. With Conventional Implikaturnya Potts’s (2005). ww.utsuka.ac.jp/῀kubota.yusuke.fn/papers/ci_salt.pdf