STUDI KELAYAKAN TEKNIS DAN BIAYA PEMBANGUNAN TEMPAT PEMBERHENTIAN BUS TRANS METRO DEWATA KORIDOR 2
Keywords:
Bus stop feasibility study, expert choice, bus stop construction costs, trans metro dewataAbstract
Determining the location and number of stops has an important role in
using the BRT mode. Improper construction of bus stops will result in increased
transportation problems, because many people who should be the target users
become reluctant to use this mode because of difficulties when using existing
facilities. The main reason why passengers do not use bus stops as a place to get
on/off from public transport is that the distance they have to travel to get to the bus
stop is too far. With the increasing number of bus stops being built, it means that
the level of accessibility of bus services is increasing. However, on the other hand,
building too many bus stops can lead to greater construction and maintenance
costs. Because of the large costs required to build a bus stop, it is necessary to make
the construction of the bus stop effective. Data collection is an activity to search for
data in the field that will be used to answer research problems. In this case, the
researcher also collected secondary data, where the data was obtained from parties
who have data on the number of passengers, bus data, and bus stop location data.
Global priorities are an assessment of the final weight of decision alternatives so
that it can be concluded which bus stop is the main choice for waiting for arrivals.
Trans Metro Dewata bus corridor 2, ranked first is the Dewi Sartika bus stop with
a score of 27.6%, second place is the SMP 10 bus stop with a score of 22.9%, third
place is the Gedung Dharma Alaya stop with a score of 20.3 %, ranked fourth by
the Suli 2 bus stop with a value of 15.4%, and last ranked by the Kerta Sari bus stop
with a value of 13.8%. The technical condition of the bus stop on corridor 2 has 69
stopping points. From the survey results, it was recorded that there were only 5 bus
stop houses, 46 bus stop poles and 18 points that did not have signs. At each
stopping point, it was assessed that there was still minimal information regarding
the bus route.