EVALUASI PENGADAAN PEKERJAAN KONSTRUKSI DENGAN KATALOG ELEKTRONIK (E-KATALOG) DITINJAU DARI SEGI PRINSIP EFEKTIF DAN EFISIEN (STUDI KASUS : KABUPATEN BANYUWANGI)

Abstract

Since the beginning of 2022, Banyuwangi Regency has implemented the use of the E-Purchasing system with E-Catalog in the procurement of government goods/services, including the procurement of construction work. Banyuwangi Regency won 2nd place in the 2023 provincial E-Purchasing Awards involving 700 local MSMEs. However, the number of broadcast products and construction service transactions is still far behind, namely only 210 broadcast products and 746 transactions (3.5%) from 6 construction service product showcases. Therefore, there is a need for research on evaluation to determine the level of efficiency and effectiveness in the construction work procurement process through E[1]Catalog.This research adopts quantitative descriptive methods and data analysis using validity tests, reliability tests, and Importance Performance Analysis (IPA) methods. Validity and reliability test methods are used to measure the suitability of the statements in the questionnaire and measure the level of ability or consistency of a questionnaire. Meanwhile, the Importance Performance Analysis (IPA) method has the main function of displaying information related to service factors related to consumer interests and satisfaction in a company or system, which in this case is used in evaluating the E-Catalog system in terms of effectiveness and efficiency.Based on the results of research on the Evaluation of Construction Work Procurement Using an Electronic Catalog (E-Catalog) in Banyuwangi Regency, it was found that detailed data processing results showed that the E-Catalog in the process of procuring construction work was very EFFECTIVE and EFFICIENT with an average score from the performance assessment and consumer satisfaction with the value 3.65 on a scale of 4 or if assessed in the form of a percentage worth 91.37% in terms of effectiveness the value is 3.54 on a scale of 4 or if assessed in the form of a percentage worth 88.5% in terms of efficiency